That’s an interesting idea. Having a native client for Lets Encrypt would be super useful. However, I will say my first thought was a worry that it might be disruptive, and causes users of httpd to change any current implementations of integrations with Lets Encrypt downstream.
/me stays tuned — Jacob Perkins Product Owner cPanel Inc. jacob.perk...@cpanel.net <mailto:jacob.perk...@cpanel.net> Office: 713-529-0800 x 4046 Cell: 713-560-8655 Get WEIRED | cPanel Conference 2016 http://go.cpanel.net/WEIRED <http://go.cpanel.net/WEIRED> > On Aug 26, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Jacob Champion <champio...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 08/26/2016 07:47 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: >> At LinuxCon I spoke with the director of the LetsEncrypt project - whose >> business card I haven't yet found in unpacking - and he asked whether >> the httpd project would be interested in LetsEncrypt being "in" httpd. >> That is, when one installs httpd, letsencrypt would just be a config >> option. (I have no idea how this would actually work, but that's beside >> the point really.) >> >> Is this something that we'd be interested in, if it were contributed? I >> note that their software is under the Apache License, so there shouldn't >> be any difficulty on that front. > > I assume you mean that they would donate a Let's Encrypt *client* for us to > ship? I think that would be neat. > > --Jacob
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
