Hi Yann,
Hi Stefan,
new trace:
Core was generated by `/usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -DFOREGROUND'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x00007f459699740c in apr_ipsubnet_test (ipsub=0x7f44c003d070,
sa=0x7f4570021950) at network_io/unix/sockaddr.c:1090
#0 0x00007f459699740c in apr_ipsubnet_test (ipsub=0x7f44c003d070,
sa=0x7f4570021950) at network_io/unix/sockaddr.c:1090
#1 0x00007f459573b400 in find_allowdeny (r=r@entry=0x7f44c002c250,
method=method@entry=0, a=<optimized out>, a=<optimized out>)
at mod_access_compat.c:270
#2 0x00007f459573b59a in check_dir_access (r=0x7f44c002c250)
at mod_access_compat.c:324
#3 0x0000560ce8333fd0 in ap_run_access_checker (r=0x7f44c002c250)
at request.c:87
#4 0x0000560ce8336ea8 in ap_process_request_internal (r=0x7f44c002c250)
at request.c:265
#5 0x0000560ce8377b40 in ap_process_async_request (r=0x7f44c002c250)
at http_request.c:434
#6 0x0000560ce8377cf0 in ap_process_request (r=0x7f44c002c250)
at http_request.c:471
#7 0x0000560ce83b8aad in h2_task_process_request (c=<optimized out>,
task=<optimized out>) at h2_task.c:612
#8 h2_task_process_conn (c=0x7f44c003d070) at h2_task.c:659
#9 0x0000560ce8347fd0 in ap_run_process_connection (c=0x7f44c0026220)
at connection.c:42
#10 0x0000560ce83b9eaf in h2_task_do (task=0x7f44c002a240,
thread=0x560ce8afc900, worker_id=365015362) at h2_task.c:578
#11 0x0000560ce83c362f in execute (thread=0x560ce8afc900,
wctx=0x560ce8afc8c0)
at h2_worker.c:46
#12 0x00007f45967610a4 in start_thread ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
#13 0x00007f459649662d in clone () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
Stefan
Am 23.02.2017 um 07:59 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
> Am 22.02.2017 um 12:22 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
>> <s.pri...@profihost.ag> wrote:
>>>
>>> @Yann how should i test? Vanilla 2.4.25 + MPM V7 + mod_http2 v1.9.1?
>>
>> Yes, I think this is the right thing to do for now (no more patches than v7).
>>
>>> Or
>>> do i need V8 or something else?
>>
>> Not ready yet, I'll propose it when that's the case if you can test it then.
>> That's an mpm_event optimization (hopefully) only, v7 is good from
>> correctness POV...
>
> OK it's running. Will report back.
>
> Greets,
> Stefan
>
>> Thanks for testing, still!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yann.
>>
