On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Stefan Eissing
<stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote:
> Meh.
>
> Stefan: once during the last 2 days or several?
>
>
> This is accessing r->useragent_addr by mod_access_compat which is, for h2
> slaves, initialized with c->client_addr.
>
> Since c->client_addr is always initialized by the master connection, I did
> not see any race issues with sharing this across multiple slaves. Anyone has
> an idea?
No idea, but don't see it related to http2, though.
I'm there:
1078 APR_DECLARE(int) apr_ipsubnet_test(apr_ipsubnet_t *ipsub,
apr_sockaddr_t *sa)
1079 {
1080 #if APR_HAVE_IPV6
1081 /* XXX This line will segv on Win32 build with APR_HAVE_IPV6,
1082 * but without the IPV6 drivers installed.
1083 */
1084 if (sa->family == AF_INET) {
1085 if (ipsub->family == AF_INET &&
1086 ((sa->sa.sin.sin_addr.s_addr & ipsub->mask[0]) ==
ipsub->sub[0])) {
1087 return 1;
1088 }
1089 }
1090 else if (IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED((struct in6_addr *)sa->ipaddr_ptr)) {
1091 if (ipsub->family == AF_INET &&
1092 (((apr_uint32_t *)sa->ipaddr_ptr)[3] &
ipsub->mask[0]) == ipsub->sub[0]) {
1093 return 1;
1094 }
1095 }
1096 else if (sa->family == AF_INET6 && ipsub->family == AF_INET6) {
1097 apr_uint32_t *addr = (apr_uint32_t *)sa->ipaddr_ptr;
1098
1099 if ((addr[0] & ipsub->mask[0]) == ipsub->sub[0] &&
1100 (addr[1] & ipsub->mask[1]) == ipsub->sub[1] &&
1101 (addr[2] & ipsub->mask[2]) == ipsub->sub[2] &&
1102 (addr[3] & ipsub->mask[3]) == ipsub->sub[3]) {
1103 return 1;
1104 }
1105 }
1106 #else
1107 if ((sa->sa.sin.sin_addr.s_addr & ipsub->mask[0]) == ipsub->sub[0]) {
1108 return 1;
1109 }
1110 #endif /* APR_HAVE_IPV6 */
1111 return 0; /* no match */
1112 }
=> IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED((struct in6_addr *)sa->ipaddr_ptr)
Hmm...
