On 06/20/2017 10:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
All this is, IMO, moot until we have a *patch*.
Agreed. See my other fork of this thread for my questions on that.
Right now there is a work-around, which, again IMO, reduces the "need" to release something "now"... the only question is whether the patch changes the behavior of the 2 current settings or whether it adds a 3rd option (the latter is my recommendation).
The faster we can patch, the less there is a need to introduce yet another "ProxyFcgiBackendType FPM-But-Better-And-Without-Bugs-This-Time" option.
--Jacob
