> On Jun 20, 2017, at 1:18 PM, Jacob Champion <champio...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 06/20/2017 10:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> All this is, IMO, moot until we have a *patch*. > > Agreed. See my other fork of this thread for my questions on that. > >> Right now there >> is a work-around, which, again IMO, reduces the "need" to release >> something "now"... the only question is whether the patch changes >> the behavior of the 2 current settings or whether it adds a 3rd >> option (the latter is my recommendation). > > The faster we can patch, the less there is a need to introduce yet another > "ProxyFcgiBackendType FPM-But-Better-And-Without-Bugs-This-Time" option. >
It's already in the wild.
