On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > I still think that the below has value and should not be/have-been > reverted. > > Anyone opposed to me re-adding it to trunk and removing it > from the backport proposal?
Would an fcgi query it and look at PATH_INFO/TRANSLATED instead or e.g. SCRIPT_NAME/TRANSLATED? -- Eric Covener [email protected]
