On 06/30/2017 08:41 AM, Jacob Champion wrote:
On 06/30/2017 08:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Well, in 2.4.26 is WAS/IS an entry in notes available to modules
Well... hm. I guess that's a valid point. My preference is still to
remove it since it's undocumented, but if anyone else would like to see
it back in, I'm fine with that.
After mulling it over a bit... I think you've convinced me, Jim. I would
probably die of shame if someone started using that note in 2.4.26 and
my "final patch" just extended the regression train. ;P
As far as I can tell it has no downsides, so my only request is that we
add it to CHANGES (or some documentation, somewhere) and get a test in
place before it goes back in. I may be able to get to that later this
afternoon.
--Jacob
