On 06/30/2017 05:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I still think that the below has value and should not be/have-been reverted.
I'm not arguing that it doesn't have value in theory, but IMO it doesn't belong in 2.4.x without a client. Right now it's just dead code.
Anyone opposed to me re-adding it to trunk and removing it from the backport proposal?
Yes. Unless you have a use case for it at this moment, I'd prefer that it be re-backported if and when that use case materializes, but I will defer to the majority here.
--Jacob
