On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 01:15:07PM +0100, Luca Toscano wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> in https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57585 it was asked to
> relax a bit how IncludeOptional works to allow a config to specify a path
> in IncludeOptional that might not be (yet) on the file system (without
> using * in the directory path).
> For example, in the bugzilla task this use case is presented:
> I found the report while dealing with an apache config issue on Debian
> Stretch with a colleague:
> I am wondering if there is the chance to review the IncludeOptional
> behavior or if there are solid reason not to.
I think having IncludeOptional do nothing if any path element is missing
makes more sense, I'd assumed it worked like that already. Should be
fine to make that change in 2.4.x too IMO.