> Am 06.11.2017 um 12:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic <[email protected]>: > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Joe Orton <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 01:15:07PM +0100, Luca Toscano wrote: >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> in https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57585 it was asked to >>> relax a bit how IncludeOptional works to allow a config to specify a path >>> in IncludeOptional that might not be (yet) on the file system (without >>> using * in the directory path). >>> >>> For example, in the bugzilla task this use case is presented: >>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57585#c6 >>> >>> I found the report while dealing with an apache config issue on Debian >>> Stretch with a colleague: >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878920 >>> >>> I am wondering if there is the chance to review the IncludeOptional >>> behavior or if there are solid reason not to. >> >> I think having IncludeOptional do nothing if any path element is missing >> makes more sense, I'd assumed it worked like that already. Should be >> fine to make that change in 2.4.x too IMO. > > +1 > > Regards, > Yann.
+1
