On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 01:15:07PM +0100, Luca Toscano wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> in https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57585 it was asked to >> relax a bit how IncludeOptional works to allow a config to specify a path >> in IncludeOptional that might not be (yet) on the file system (without >> using * in the directory path). >> >> For example, in the bugzilla task this use case is presented: >> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57585#c6 >> >> I found the report while dealing with an apache config issue on Debian >> Stretch with a colleague: >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878920 >> >> I am wondering if there is the chance to review the IncludeOptional >> behavior or if there are solid reason not to. > > I think having IncludeOptional do nothing if any path element is missing > makes more sense, I'd assumed it worked like that already. Should be > fine to make that change in 2.4.x too IMO.
+1 Regards, Yann.