+1 from me!!

> On Nov 15, 2017, at 4:59 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> 
> wrote:
> 
> Now that Gregg has landed Windows build support in trunk (yay!), I would 
> really like us to include the Let's Encrypt Support in the next 2.4 release 
> as an experimental mod_md plus the required and recommended changes to 
> mod_ssl.
> 
> Atm there is one blocker that prevents me from proposing mod_ssl backports: 
> the pending backport of "Handle SSLProxy* directives in <Proxy> sections" by 
> Yann. That one has just many changes in the module and making independant 
> patches with/without that one is too much work. With one vote missing, if 
> anyone could find the cycles to vote on that, that'd be great.
> 
> Once that is out of the way, I will propose the following changes for 
> backport:
> 
> 1. mod_md plus the *required* mod_ssl changes for interworking
> 2. SSLPolicy/SSLProxyPolicy feature
> 3. SSLEngine addr:port feature
> 
> 2+3 are not required. For 2 I have gotten a lot of responses by people who'd 
> like to have that for their servers. 3 I do not feel strong about.
> 
> Maybe we can give our early adopters a nice Xmas present.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Stefan
> 
> 

Reply via email to