> On Dec 11, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> A cause for minimal participation can be that dev is going with git. 
> 
> Mentioned Issues and Requests are at https://github.com/icing/mod_md/issues 
> <https://github.com/icing/mod_md/issues> and not at a httpd  list. 
> 
> The renaming discussion  was one of the mod_md sporadic posts on the dev list 
> at a late moment. Do not feel kidding, I think the more you use this list the 
> more responses you get (only 22 are watching at git).
> 
> The windows community has tested/participated from the beginning. I do not 
> know how much is tested  on other platforms by users.
> 
> From now on I prefer to discuss issues/requests here at this list. And I like 
> to see test reports from non-windows platforms.
> 
> @Jim In status I see you voted +1, is that based on code review and/or 
> testing ?

Yes, both :)

> 
> 
> 
>  
> On Monday 11/12/2017 at 11:11, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 11.12.2017 um 11:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de 
>>> <mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>>:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Am 08.12.2017 um 19:35 schrieb William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net 
>>>> <mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net>>:
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> Maybe ManagedDomain and <ManagedDomainDefine>, as iiuc we are going to use
>>>>> for SSLPolicy?
>>>> 
>>>> Just an observation, 
>>>> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/quickreference.html 
>>>> <http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/quickreference.html>
>>>> illustrated that we have no verbs in <Section > directive block
>>>> titles, thus far.
>>>> 
>>>> <ManagedDomain > or <MDPolicy > followed by ManagedDomainSet
>>>> or MDPolicyElect or something similar seems more in keeping with the
>>>> existing naming convention for directives. Bothers me when we overload
>>>> with yet one additional naming scheme, that would probably bother our
>>>> users more than confusing directive names.
>>> 
>>> There are important questions on how we progress the design of the server. 
>>> I 
>>> have asked for participation and feedback on the design of ACME support in 
>>> httpd
>>> since April. Shoulder clapping, "go ahead!", "fine!".
>>> 
>>> Answers to design questions: not really
>>> Requests for opinion about a "restart" feature: 0
>>> Code request for a Windows Service restart call: 0
>>> Request of a serf based implementation of the http client: 0
>>> Feedback from testing by the team: 0
>> 
>> Correction: Steffen and Luca have tested and given feedback.
>> 
>>> Opinions about renaming parts/the whole thing just days before
>>> a possible release to users who want this: +7
>>> 
>>> You got to be kiddding me!
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Stefan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to