On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > With my proposal, this is lost only if IP:port(s) or > ServerName/Alias(s) change, which is already a win and shouldn't > change the way each balancer is bound to its vhost (i.e. a request on > a vhost wouldn't be accounted/handled by a lb on another vhost).
I am thinking no ServerAlias in the hash.
