And perhaps sufficient testing of the end result? The number of exceptions at the moment bode ill for a stable long term release. Feature dumps always introduce instability.
Maybe a bug fix only freeze for a short period to stabilize that pile of code? On Feb 14, 2018 06:41, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > Yes... there are/were a few backports which are/were lacking > a single vote... > > On Feb 13, 2018, at 1:23 PM, Nic Jansma <n...@nicj.net> wrote: > > Are there still plans to push for a 2.4.30 soon? There's a couple bug > fixes in it that I'd love to have in the official builds! > > Thanks, > > - Nic > > On 2018/01/04 12:43:12, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> > <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > As we get settled into the new year, it seems a good time> > > to think about a 2.4.30 release in the coming week or> > > so. Lots of good stuff currently in 2.4.30-dev and even> > > more good stuff in STATUS awaiting a single vote!> > > > > Let's see if we can clean-up STATUS, get 2.4.30-dev into> > > fantastic shape, and "commit" to doing a release no later> > > than mid Jan.> > > > > I volunteer to RM and/or help someone else RM.> > > > > >