I was wrong about OtherBill suggesting it be in mod_remoteip... it
was actually Daniel:

   
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b79ff329bb6163bb63d1284696360385313a402a6a70604459604e48@%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E
 
<https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b79ff329bb6163bb63d1284696360385313a402a6a70604459604e48@%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E>

Apologies on the mistake.

> On Dec 13, 2017, at 7:53 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> 
> Hmmm
> 
> 
> 
>     
> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?c...@httpd.apache.org:lte=24M:proxyprotocol
>  
> <https://lists.apache.org/list.html?c...@httpd.apache.org:lte=24M:proxyprotocol>
> 
> Note when 1st committed.
> 
>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 7:19 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net 
>> <mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com 
>> <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 1:02 AM, Jordan Gigov <colad...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:colad...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 12 December 2017 at 11:32, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de 
>>> <mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Fellow Apache developers: if we want to make an X-mas 2.4 release for the
>>>> people on this planet, the backports in STATUS need your attention:
>>>> 
>>>> B2: mod_remoteip: Add PROXY protocol support
>>>>  - needs 1 more vote!
>>>> 
>>> I find that trying to have both Proxy Protocol and the old remoteip
>>> functionality in the same mod is harder to maintain. I propose that they be
>>> split up before an official release.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> IIRC, that was the way it was. OtherBill wanted the functionality
>>> in mod_remoteip.
>> 
>> Oh, no, you most definitely mis-remember. It was presented as a remoteip
>> addition from the get-go.
> 

Reply via email to