On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer >>> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience? >> >> +1 > > Should we also mention the regression against mod_security on Windows? > (Nobody can reproduce on Unix, correct?)
This is not a regression, always been there (or almost) in 2.4.x. > > What about the mod_md pegged infinite retry problem that was raised > a month or two back, particularly evident on Windows? Is the fact that > the module is experimental enough to evade mention in Announcement? We don't have much details on it yet, configuration issue?
