On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer >>>> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience? >>> >>> +1 >> >> Should we also mention the regression against mod_security on Windows? >> (Nobody can reproduce on Unix, correct?) > > This is not a regression, always been there (or almost) in 2.4.x.
Thanks for clarifying (not worthy of mention then) >> What about the mod_md pegged infinite retry problem that was raised >> a month or two back, particularly evident on Windows? Is the fact that >> the module is experimental enough to evade mention in Announcement? > > We don't have much details on it yet, configuration issue? I think we were waiting on json data, or Stefan has an inkling of how we received negative delta now.
