> Am 25.10.2019 um 14:48 schrieb Yann Ylavic <[email protected]>:
> 
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:08 PM Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Could the callback behave differently in the omitted case (opt-in)?
>> That would allow the case where it's explicit to be handled better
>> OOTB (not even opt-out really)
> 
> Nice idea, I suppose I could make the callback check for
> ->protocol_set == 0 and not switch in this case.
> The opt-in may not be that useful then, without it (or "off") the
> default would be the base server's SSLProtocol, while "on" would be
> whatever SSLProtocol default is?
> 
> If we don't care about the compatibility of an explicit SSLProtocol
> (e.g any SSLProtocol specified in my server2 example) which was
> ignored until now but which suddenly isn't, I can go with that change.

+1

Reply via email to