> Am 25.10.2019 um 14:48 schrieb Yann Ylavic <[email protected]>: > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:08 PM Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Could the callback behave differently in the omitted case (opt-in)? >> That would allow the case where it's explicit to be handled better >> OOTB (not even opt-out really) > > Nice idea, I suppose I could make the callback check for > ->protocol_set == 0 and not switch in this case. > The opt-in may not be that useful then, without it (or "off") the > default would be the base server's SSLProtocol, while "on" would be > whatever SSLProtocol default is? > > If we don't care about the compatibility of an explicit SSLProtocol > (e.g any SSLProtocol specified in my server2 example) which was > ignored until now but which suddenly isn't, I can go with that change. +1
- Opt in(/out?) for TLS protocol per vhost (was: svn commit:... Yann Ylavic
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS protocol per vhost (was: sv... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS protocol per vhost (was... Yann Ylavic
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS protocol per vhost ... Eric Covener
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS protocol per vh... Eric Covener
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS protocol p... Yann Ylavic
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS protoc... Eric Covener
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... Yann Ylavic
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... Yann Ylavic
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... Yann Ylavic
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... Yann Ylavic
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... Alex Hautequest
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... Yann Ylavic
- RE: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... hquest
- RE: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... hquest
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... Yann Ylavic
- Re: Opt in(/out?) for TLS pr... Stefan Eissing
