On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 3:16 PM Stefan Eissing
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Am 25.10.2019 um 14:48 schrieb Yann Ylavic <[email protected]>:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:08 PM Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Could the callback behave differently in the omitted case (opt-in)?
> >> That would allow the case where it's explicit to be handled better
> >> OOTB (not even opt-out really)
> >
> > Nice idea, I suppose I could make the callback check for
> > ->protocol_set == 0 and not switch in this case.
> > The opt-in may not be that useful then, without it (or "off") the
> > default would be the base server's SSLProtocol, while "on" would be
> > whatever SSLProtocol default is?
> >
> > If we don't care about the compatibility of an explicit SSLProtocol
> > (e.g any SSLProtocol specified in my server2 example) which was
> > ignored until now but which suddenly isn't, I can go with that change.
>
> +1

r1868929

Reply via email to