#define RHLOGNO(n) "RH" #n ": " and have your own number space?
> Am 01.12.2020 um 15:33 schrieb Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>: > > Very occasionally we backport patches to RHEL's httpd package in a way > that introduces new or different logging output from 2.4/trunk. I'm > wondering if there is any opinion about vendors asking for for a small > (say, 100?) reserved range of APLOGNO() space to use for such cases? > Basically I'd just commit "next-number += 100" and use that range within > downstream patches since they are then reserved upstream. > > 1) No, we should discourage vendors from such divergence. > > 2) Yes, they are just numbers, I don't care. > > 3) Yes, but commit to maintaining a public URL with documentation for > each log message used or something similar. > > Thoughts? > > Regards, Joe >
