Hi Stefan,
Günter is dead at 2020.
Please cancel all Email..
mfg.
Am 2021-02-23 15:18, schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Am 23.02.2021 um 12:18 schrieb Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>:
On 2/23/21 11:26 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Am 23.02.2021 um 11:14 schrieb Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 05:28:03PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Regarding my proposal to add SSL related inquiry functions to our
core server, here
is a patch for the "ssl_is_https()" function. This allows:
a) anyone to inquire about a connections SSLiness without the
optional function retrieval.
It will itself call such a function provided by a module. So this
should make anyone
using the new ap_ssl_is_ssl(c) remain compatible to existing ssl
modules.
This makes sense to me except, obviously, I will start a fight to
bikeshed the naming, since "SSL is SSL" scans quite weirdly?
ap_is_https() or ap_conn_is_{ssl,tls}() or something would be better
IMO?
Was ping-pong in this as well. But we need to extend this for other
'ssl' optional functions and I thought keeping a comming 'ap_ssl_'
prefix is overall better to parse. But I am not strong opinioned on
this.
Maybe ap_ssl_conn_is_{ssl,tls}() is a middle ground with respect to
the need for further ap_ssl_ functions?
Fine with me!
