On 9/10/21 10:50 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 09:42:10AM +0200, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 10.09.2021 um 09:02 schrieb Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 03:23:13PM -0700, Gregg Smith wrote:
>>>> Since OpenSSL 3.0.0 GA came out yesterday (Californuts time) I think it
>>>> would be nice to have r1891138 backported for those wishing to try it out.
>>>> What you say?
>>>
>>> I'd say it's better to try to get a successful release out, then try to
>>> get new features in the stable branch. (In fact, I'd be quite happy if
>>> we had 2.5.x/2.6 released and stopped trying new features in 2.4 :)
>>>
>>> That revision is not sufficient, I have a hopefully-complete set of
>>> OpenSSL 3.0 backports at: https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/258
>>
>> Do you want that in 2.4.49? (we can always to a 2.4.50 OpenSSL3
>> release shortly afterwards, imo)
>
> For me, I'd not want to delay or risk regressions in .49 for this, it's
> only a small niche of users who care about it at the moment. I plan to
> propose the PR for backport after the next release.
+1
>
> (It'd be nice to get 3.0 building in Travis so we can be more confident
> about keeping that working, not sure if anybody is testing trunk against
> it regularly right now?)
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
