> Am 10.09.2021 um 11:07 schrieb Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>:
>
>
>
> On 9/10/21 10:50 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 09:42:10AM +0200, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Am 10.09.2021 um 09:02 schrieb Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 03:23:13PM -0700, Gregg Smith wrote:
>>>>> Since OpenSSL 3.0.0 GA came out yesterday (Californuts time) I think it
>>>>> would be nice to have r1891138 backported for those wishing to try it out.
>>>>> What you say?
>>>>
>>>> I'd say it's better to try to get a successful release out, then try to
>>>> get new features in the stable branch. (In fact, I'd be quite happy if
>>>> we had 2.5.x/2.6 released and stopped trying new features in 2.4 :)
>>>>
>>>> That revision is not sufficient, I have a hopefully-complete set of
>>>> OpenSSL 3.0 backports at: https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/258
>>>
>>> Do you want that in 2.4.49? (we can always to a 2.4.50 OpenSSL3
>>> release shortly afterwards, imo)
>>
>> For me, I'd not want to delay or risk regressions in .49 for this, it's
>> only a small niche of users who care about it at the moment. I plan to
>> propose the PR for backport after the next release.
>
> +1
>
>>
>> (It'd be nice to get 3.0 building in Travis so we can be more confident
>> about keeping that working, not sure if anybody is testing trunk against
>> it regularly right now?)
>
> +1
So far, I hear that people think we should make a 2.4.49 based
on the current 2.4.x.
I will do some IRL errands and things and come back to this
in the afternoon. If this still stands then, I'll create a
2.4.49-rc1 and put that to the vote.
cheers,
Stefan
