On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 2:07 PM Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 3:02 AM Dennis Clarke <dcla...@blastwave.org> wrote: > > > > On 9/12/21 02:36, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > On 9/10/21 11:23, ste...@eissing.org wrote: > > >> Hi, all; > > >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > >> > > >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > > >> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as 2.4.49: > > >> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > > >> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > > >> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > >> > > > > * * * NOTE -1 There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. * * * > > > > > > > Reply to self here ... > > > > I discovered in the OpenSSL 3.0.0 release notes: > > > > > > * The ERR_GET_FUNC() function was removed. With the loss > > of meaningful function codes, this function can only > > cause problems for calling applications. > > > > Paul Dale > > > > > > Thus ERR_GET_FUNC() was removed, but it looks like httpd is still > > trying to use it, which explains the error I'm seeing. What I see > > is : > > > This seems like a configuration that wouldn't have worked for 2.4.48. > I don't think it has any bearing on a 2.4.49 release.
+1
