Thanks Luciano for the comments.
I  looked at other projects that are currently incubating to see how they setup 
top-level LICENSE and NOTICE files. As you mentioned, these files are generated 
for source release. I have updated HUDI's NOTICE and LICENSE  files in the same 
way. 
 I have also addressed other comments. Please review the changes.
Thanks,Balaji.V
For Reference, NOTICE and LICENSE in other incubating projects
1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-gobblin/blob/master/LICENSE
2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-gobblin/blob/master/NOTICE
3. https://github.com/apache/incubator-heron/blob/master/LICENSE
4. https://github.com/apache/incubator-heron/blob/master/NOTICE

    On Tuesday, September 24, 2019, 06:54:29 AM PDT, Luciano Resende 
<[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 I will look into this and get back to you tonight.

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:30 [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Luciano,
> I went through the licensing link you provided and have addressed all the
> comments in this PR : https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/918
> I have described the steps I used to generate the final NOTICE file. Can
> you please review this PR and see if it makes sense.
>
> Thanks,Balaji.V
>    On Friday, September 20, 2019, 03:47:56 PM PDT, Luciano Resende <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Based on the current DISCLAIMER I am assuming fully compliant release.
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> Signatures ok,
>
> the source distribution contains a binary jar which is not allowed
> ./hudi-cli/lib/dnl/utils/textutils/0.3.3/textutils-0.3.3.jar
>
> Missing headers:
>  !????? ./README.md
>  !????? ./RELEASE_NOTES.md
> !????? ./docker/hoodie/hadoop/prestobase/Dockerfile
> !????? ./packaging/README.md
>
> Your notice has too many unnecessary mentions, please see the guide here
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
>
> Also, you should not add the additional lines such as
> "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you
> may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may
> obtain a copy of the License at"
>
> " Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
> distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
> WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
> implied. See the License for the specific language governing
> permissions and limitations under the License."
>
> these are already built into the license, and properly worded.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:02 PM [email protected] <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,We have a new release candidate after addressing issues
> reported in first release candidate (see email thread)The new version is :
> 0.5.0-incubating-rc2. Please review and vote on the release candidate #2
> for version 0.5.0, as follows:
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please
> provide specific comments)The complete staging area is available for your
> review, which includes:
> >    - JIRA release notes [1]
> >    - The official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> to be deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> fingerprint AF9BAF79D311A3D3288E583F24A499037262AAA4  [3],
> >
> >    - all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4]
> >
> >    - source code tag "release-0.5.0-incubating-rc2" [5]
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > Please cast your votes before *Sep. 20 2019, 21:00 UTC*.
> >
> > It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative
> votes.
> >    -
> https://jira.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12322822&version=12346087
> >    -
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hudi/hudi-0.5.0-incubating-rc2/
> >    - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/hudi/KEYS
> >    -
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehudi-1002/
> >    -
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/tree/release-0.5.0-incubating-rc2
> >
> >
> > P.S. : As this is a first time where Hudi community will be performing
> release voting, you can look at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/75e40ed5a6e0c3174728a0bcfe86cbcd99ae4778ebe94b839f0674cd@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> for some understanding of validations community does to cast their
> votes.Thanks,Balaji.V
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/

-- 
Sent from my Mobile device
  

Reply via email to