Hi Vinoth, >>We may need to revert HUDI-676[3]: Address issues towards removing use of WIP Disclaimer >>I think we should address the feedback and ensure VOTE passed with "non >>WIP" disclaimer.. the WIP disclaimer cannot be retained forever and needs >>to be fixed before graduation IIUC.
So you mean, we keep the standard disclaimer? Then we can discuss it when we vote for rc2, if someone raises this issue again. WDYT? >>As you bundled several ASF projects that have NOTICE files, >>Again, we are back to binary vs source releases.. the source releases we >>make DO NOT bundle anything.. So we should not have to add anything to >>NOTICE. The same link mentioned, also states, "dont include stuff >>unnecessarily" (not a quote). Does maven jars count as binary distribution >>of software? I suggest we file a LEGAL issue, get it stamped by the right >>folks and do that. This can be a good strategy, in addition to looking at >>other projects. So, the question remains how to look at the word "*bundle*". We have some weird statements in the LICENSE file, excerpted one of them as follows: *--------------------------------------------------------------------------------This product includes code from Apache Hive.* org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.CombineHiveInputFormat copied to org.apache.hudi.hadoop.hive.HoodieCombineHiveInputFormatCopyright: 2011-2019 The Apache Software FoundationHome page: http://hive.apache.org/ <http://hive.apache.org/>License: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------* Regarding "*This product includes code from *", I don't seem to see this pattern from other projects. So the question here is, even if we only publish the source code, is this behavior considered as bundling other projects (because we do copy the source code from other projects, the source code is obviously one of the assets of other projects)? Unfortunately, I did not find a clear clarification from the Apache official website. Obviously, there are two possibilities here: - This is a kind of bundle, but we are not clear or there is a deviation in understanding; - This is not a bundle, but there is a misunderstanding during voting, and we have not clarified this; In short, our LICENSE contains a relatively uncommon description "*This product includes code from *". In this regard, the main problem here is the information asymmetry between us and the IPMC. I don't think it makes much sense to refer to other projects or interpret the official documents. A more efficient way is to communicate directly with Justin and clarify. Understand his thoughts and express our confusion. What do you think? Best, Vino Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> 于2020年3月19日周四 上午12:05写道： > Thanks for the update, vino! > > here's the -1 vote feedback for everyone's context.. > > As you bundled several ASF projects that have NOTICE files, their NOTICE > > files need to be examined and parts added to your NOTICE file. [1] > > License is missing information fo this file copyright Twitter [3] > > Perhaps you should consider using the work in progress disclaimer. [2] > > Thanks, > > Justin > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > > 2. > > > https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#work_in_progress_disclaimer > > > > >>We may need to revert HUDI-676[3]: Address issues towards removing use of > WIP Disclaimer > I think we should address the feedback and ensure VOTE passed with "non > WIP" disclaimer.. the WIP disclaimer cannot be retained forever and needs > to be fixed before graduation IIUC. > > >>As you bundled several ASF projects that have NOTICE files, > Again, we are back to binary vs source releases.. the source releases we > make DO NOT bundle anything.. So we should not have to add anything to > NOTICE. The same link mentioned, also states, "dont include stuff > unnecessarily" (not a quote). Does maven jars count as binary distribution > of software? I suggest we file a LEGAL issue, get it stamped by the right > folks and do that. This can be a good strategy, in addition to looking at > other projects. > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:27 AM vino yang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We encountered some issues while voting RC1 on general@[1], so we > canceled > > the vote for rc1. The blocker issues we are currently addressing are: > > > > * HUDI-720: NOTICE file needs to add more content based on the NOTICE > files > > of the ASF projects that hudi bundles(I have opened a PR[2] to fix it) > > * We may need to revert HUDI-676[3]: Address issues towards removing use > of > > WIP Disclaimer > > > > I will prepare 0.5.2 RC2 ASAP after fixing them. Please be patient. > > > > Best, > > Vino > > > > [1]: > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/202003.mbox/%3C932F44A0-1CEE-4549-896B-70FB61EAA034%40classsoftware.com%3E > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/1417 > > [3]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/1386 > > >
