The DTD is already in the WEB-INF/lib, as they're included in the JAR files.  :-)

Cheers,
Clinton

On 7/26/06, netsql < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Better yet, put your dtd in WEB-INF/lib.
.V


Clinton Begin wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Guess what!  On average, an iBATIS DTD is served up every 1.8 seconds
> from ibatis.com <http://ibatis.com >, and nearly 1.5 million per month.
>
> I know this because it's taking down my new web hosting service.  Which
> sucks and, as far as I'm concerned, it's all due to WestHost sucking as
> a service provider ( Pair.com <http://Pair.com> had no issues for the
> last 5 years).
>
> I know 1 per 2 seconds doesn't sound like much...realize that that's
> just the average.  The reality is that some hours during the day, DTDs
> are being requested at an incredible rate, an average of 32 per second,
> which still doesn't sound like a lot -- but what can I say, WestHost sucks.
>
> Unfortunately I signed up for 2.5 years.  :-)  Think they'll give me a
> refund...no.  Anyway...
>
> So:
>
>     * Nearly a year ago I warned that the iBATIS DTDs will be moved to
>       Apache, and the warning has been on the homepage for just as long.
>     * The DTDs should be resolved from the JAR file if you're using a
>       modern version.
>     * It's time to finally pull the plug.
>
> In 72 hours, I will remove the DTDs from iBATIS.com forever.
>
> You don't need to upgrade iBATIS to fix the problem, you just need to
> change your XML files.
>
> <!DOCTYPE sqlMapConfig
>
>   PUBLIC "-//ibatis.apache.org//DTD SQL Map Config 2.0//EN"
>   "http://ibatis.apache.org/dtd/sql-map-config-2.dtd">
>
> <!DOCTYPE sqlMap
>   PUBLIC "-//ibatis.apache.org//DTD SQL Map 2.0//EN"
>   "http://ibatis.apache.org/dtd/sql-map-2.dtd ">
>
> <!DOCTYPE daoConfig
>   PUBLIC "-//ibatis.apache.org//DTD DAO Configuration 2.0//EN"
>   "http://ibatis.apache.org/dtd/dao-2.dtd ">
>
> Oh look, it's 11pm on the west coast. That means at 11pm on Friday, the
> DTDs will be gone.
>
> Sorry for any inconvenience.  But you have had a year.  :-)
>
> Best regards.
>
> Clinton
>
>
>


Reply via email to