I would say we should keep them and make it clear in the documentation and the dtd that in most cases inline parameters maps are the better choice...
Kai --- Original Nachricht --- Absender: Jeff Butler Datum: 03.06.2009 15:18 > You can do this with inline parameter maps now in iBATIS2: > > #someParam,jdbcType=VARCHAR,mode=IN# > > The advanced inline parameter syntax has every option available in a > declared parameter map. > > Jeff Butler > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Rob Sonke <r...@tigrou.nl> wrote: > >> We're using them with Oracle procedures and functions, to specify the in >> and out modes and their jdbc types. How would you support that? >> >> Rob >> >> >> Thomas Duffey wrote: >> >> In case it helps you decide I just searched through almost 300 SQL Map XML >> files for production apps here and not a single one uses <parameterMap>. >> Tom >> >> On Jun 2, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Clinton Begin wrote: >> >> I think so. At the very least, we could just remove it from the DTD... I'm >> having a hard time letting go of one of those "just in case" moments. :-) >> Interestingly, the code is kind of a mess in the area of parameter maps, >> as it's different if you specify a parameter map vs. an inline map, due to >> dynamic SQL... it would be nice to strip it out altogether. But for now, >> DTD removal will do. >> >> Clinton >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Jeff Butler <jeffgbut...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I just answered the same question on the user list about parameterMaps for >>> the 526th time (maybe I exaggerate a bit). >>> >>> Are we going to remove <parameterMap> from iBATIS3? If it were to go to a >>> vote, I would vote +1 a thousand times! >>> >>> Jeff Butler >>> >>> >> >> >
