Love the idea! On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 10:02 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 looking forward to it. One minor suggestion: adding a table spec > version label along with the feature in the support matrix. That doesn't > apply to REST spec though. > > Yufei > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 9:31 AM Kevin Liu <kevin.jq....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Renjie, >> >> I absolutely love this idea! I wanted to do something similar while >> working on the Pyiceberg roadmap. It would make sense to include this for >> all projects. >> >> Some benefits that I see, >> * Easily and quickly answer questions for "Is X supported in <> project?" >> * Roadmap for feature parity >> * Keep all the libraries in sync in terms of core features >> * As we add features to one library, we can track support in other >> libraries as well >> >> +1 to having it as a link in https://iceberg.apache.org/. I like that >> Arrow use https://arrow.apache.org/docs/status.html >> >> Looking forward to making this happen! And happy to help in any way. >> >> Best, >> Kevin Liu >> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 6:33 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Sounds like a great idea to me >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:58 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi: >>>> >>>> As iceberg evolved to a multi-lang project, I would like to propose to >>>> maintain a status page for iceberg. For more details, please refer to this >>>> doc >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sRsTatGQJJNiBiQZNUW4VwQDCV1e75BHM6cSPla4vBU/edit?usp=sharing>. >>>> Welcome to join the discussion and comment on it! >>>> >>>> >>>> -- John Zhuge
