Hi: > One minor suggestion: adding a table spec version label along with the feature in the support matrix. That doesn't apply to REST spec though.
Updated the doc, please take a look. > My only comment is probably to use versions instead of check marks, but all good :) In current approach we will write the version of each library in the beginning of the page, which seems easier to maintain than per version per feature. What do you think? On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 5:12 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I like the idea. My only comment is probably to use versions instead > of check marks, but all good :) > > Thanks ! > > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 3:33 PM Russell Spitzer > <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Sounds like a great idea to me > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:58 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi: > >> > >> As iceberg evolved to a multi-lang project, I would like to propose to > maintain a status page for iceberg. For more details, please refer to this > doc. Welcome to join the discussion and comment on it! > >> > >> >
