I haven't gotten any other issues for 1.9.1 on the milestone and no one has responded here. I think it's important that we get a version of Iceberg out with a working Version function so I'll start a release today or tomorrow for a vote.
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 1:22 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Russ > > Yes, agree. Your PR is good and already merged. > > I don't have anything blocker for 1.9.1 (still working on source-ids, > but definitely not for 1.9.1). > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 11:47 PM Russell Spitzer > <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hey y'all! > > > > Thanks to @suilis we have learned that IcebergBuild.version() is > returning unspecified for Iceberg 1.9.0. I have a PR up > > to fix this and I think this is a clear reason to do a 1.9.1 as soon as > possible. I know we have a few other issues that > > may need to be fixed as well so let's make sure we get all those listed > and I can do a release when they are ready. > > > > > > Please respond if you have any concerns or you have any issues that need > to go into a 1.9.1, > > Russ >
