Hi Russell, I went through the commits since 1.9.x release, https://github.com/apache/iceberg/compare/1.9.x...main
Here are some possible candidates for 1.9.1 patch release, * Core: Fix Kryo ser/de with StorageCredential config #12882 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12882> * Core: Ensure reactivated view version uses correct timestamp #12821 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12821> * Flink: Add lockFactory open in LockRemover for table maintenance #12900 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12900> * Flink: Fix typo in JdbcLockFactory #12940 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12940> * Flink: Change Preconditions import from flink util to guava #12939 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12939> * Core: Broaden exception handling in writer clean up logic #12863 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12863> * Enable HTTP proxy support for the client used by REST Catalog #12406 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12406> * Core: Disallow creation of invalid PartitionSpec #12887 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12887> * GCP: Support multiple storage credential prefixes #12881 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12881> * Build, Core: Let RevAPI compare against 1.9.0 / Fix API breakage around StorageCredential #12930 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12930> IMO most of these are "nice to have" as part of 1.9.1. Let me know what you think! Best, Kevin Liu On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:41 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > I haven't gotten any other issues for 1.9.1 on the milestone and no one > has responded here. > I think it's important that we get a version of Iceberg out with a working > Version function > so I'll start a release today or tomorrow for a vote. > > On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 1:22 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> Hi Russ >> >> Yes, agree. Your PR is good and already merged. >> >> I don't have anything blocker for 1.9.1 (still working on source-ids, >> but definitely not for 1.9.1). >> >> Thanks ! >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 11:47 PM Russell Spitzer >> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hey y'all! >> > >> > Thanks to @suilis we have learned that IcebergBuild.version() is >> returning unspecified for Iceberg 1.9.0. I have a PR up >> > to fix this and I think this is a clear reason to do a 1.9.1 as soon as >> possible. I know we have a few other issues that >> > may need to be fixed as well so let's make sure we get all those listed >> and I can do a release when they are ready. >> > >> > >> > Please respond if you have any concerns or you have any issues that >> need to go into a 1.9.1, >> > Russ >> >
