Thanks Kevin for the list! That looks good to me. Looking forward to getting these fixes out!
Yufei On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 10:19 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Russell, > > I went through the commits since 1.9.x release, > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/compare/1.9.x...main > > Here are some possible candidates for 1.9.1 patch release, > * Core: Fix Kryo ser/de with StorageCredential config #12882 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12882> > * Core: Ensure reactivated view version uses correct timestamp #12821 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12821> > * Flink: Add lockFactory open in LockRemover for table maintenance #12900 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12900> > * Flink: Fix typo in JdbcLockFactory #12940 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12940> > * Flink: Change Preconditions import from flink util to guava #12939 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12939> > * Core: Broaden exception handling in writer clean up logic #12863 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12863> > * Enable HTTP proxy support for the client used by REST Catalog #12406 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12406> > * Core: Disallow creation of invalid PartitionSpec #12887 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12887> > * GCP: Support multiple storage credential prefixes #12881 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12881> > * Build, Core: Let RevAPI compare against 1.9.0 / Fix API breakage around > StorageCredential #12930 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12930> > > IMO most of these are "nice to have" as part of 1.9.1. > Let me know what you think! > > Best, > Kevin Liu > > > > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:41 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I haven't gotten any other issues for 1.9.1 on the milestone and no one >> has responded here. >> I think it's important that we get a version of Iceberg out with a >> working Version function >> so I'll start a release today or tomorrow for a vote. >> >> On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 1:22 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Russ >>> >>> Yes, agree. Your PR is good and already merged. >>> >>> I don't have anything blocker for 1.9.1 (still working on source-ids, >>> but definitely not for 1.9.1). >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 11:47 PM Russell Spitzer >>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hey y'all! >>> > >>> > Thanks to @suilis we have learned that IcebergBuild.version() is >>> returning unspecified for Iceberg 1.9.0. I have a PR up >>> > to fix this and I think this is a clear reason to do a 1.9.1 as soon >>> as possible. I know we have a few other issues that >>> > may need to be fixed as well so let's make sure we get all those >>> listed and I can do a release when they are ready. >>> > >>> > >>> > Please respond if you have any concerns or you have any issues that >>> need to go into a 1.9.1, >>> > Russ >>> >>
