+1 (binding) Well done everyone who was working on this! Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. máj. 20., K, 8:49):
> +1 (binding) > > Huge milestone, thanks for driving this, Ryan! > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op di 20 mei 2025 om 08:45 schreef huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com>: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 11:17 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 8:14 AM Gidon Gershinsky <gg5...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding). >>>> Glad to see this big step forward. >>>> >>>> Cheers, Gidon >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 9:00 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> Excited to see Iceberg V3 coming together! >>>>> >>>>> - Ajantha >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:22 AM Christian Thiel < >>>>> christian.t.b...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> Christian >>>>>> >>>>>> Prashant Singh <prashant010...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di. 20. Mai >>>>>> 2025 um 07:34: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Prashant >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 10:19 PM Aihua Xu <aihu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding). Great to see we are moving forward. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:06 PM Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:04 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yufei >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 8:59 PM Amogh Jahagirdar < >>>>>>>>>> 2am...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:37 PM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:35 AM Manish Malhotra < >>>>>>>>>>>> manish.malhotra.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This is Awesome! Thanks 🙏🏼 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:09 PM Szehon Ho < >>>>>>>>>>>>> szehon.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, it's an exciting step for Iceberg! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Szehon >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:03 PM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is exciting! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 3:27 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve gone through the changes in detail and I’m confident >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they are implementable and working. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Reviewed and updated row lineage core implementation, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers/writers, and updates to Spark 3.5 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Validated the Variant encoding and shredding spec >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Built readers/writers for core object models for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unknown, timestamp(9) types >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Implemented default values and updated read paths >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Reviewed table encryption PRs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 3:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With the follow-ups from the earlier discussion thread >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrapped up, I’d like to raise a vote to adopt the v3 spec >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/main/format/spec.md#version-3-extended-types-and-capabilities> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *What is included?* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Default values for columns and fields >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - New types: variant, geospatial, timestamp(9), and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unknown >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Row lineage and change tracking using synthetic row >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IDs and row-level last modified sequence number >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Improved position deletes using binary deletion >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vectors that are synchronously maintained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Table encryption key tracking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Table metadata support for future multi-argument >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transforms >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *What does adopting these changes mean?* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adopting the changes signals that we (the community) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intend to support the current set of changes and will maintain >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward-compatibility for v3 tables that implement the v3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spec. After >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopting the changes, future breaking changes would go into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> v4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As with v2 adoption >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ws2gg52d124p7bx9jgrn3kctrtfgtltp>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is needed to build support in downstream projects and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementations. Adoption doesn’t change the default table >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version, it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signals that there will be no further break changes in v3 and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that we are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confident in supporting the v3 features. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huge thanks to everyone that has worked to get to this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point with the v3 changes! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Adopt the v3 changes to the table spec >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Wait to close v3 changes because . . . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
