+1 (non binding)

Regards
JB

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 11:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> With the follow-ups from the earlier discussion thread wrapped up, I’d like 
> to raise a vote to adopt the v3 spec changes.
>
> What is included?
>
> Default values for columns and fields
> New types: variant, geospatial, timestamp(9), and unknown
> Row lineage and change tracking using synthetic row IDs and row-level last 
> modified sequence number
> Improved position deletes using binary deletion vectors that are 
> synchronously maintained
> Table encryption key tracking
> Table metadata support for future multi-argument transforms
>
> What does adopting these changes mean?
>
> Adopting the changes signals that we (the community) intend to support the 
> current set of changes and will maintain forward-compatibility for v3 tables 
> that implement the v3 spec. After adopting the changes, future breaking 
> changes would go into v4.
>
> As with v2 adoption, this is needed to build support in downstream projects 
> and other implementations. Adoption doesn’t change the default table version, 
> it signals that there will be no further break changes in v3 and that we are 
> confident in supporting the v3 features.
>
> Huge thanks to everyone that has worked to get to this point with the v3 
> changes!
>
> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1 Adopt the v3 changes to the table spec
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Wait to close v3 changes because . . .
>
> Ryan

Reply via email to