+1 (binding)

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 5:25 AM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding). Thanks Ryan for driving this and everyone contributing
> to the new features.
>
> Regards,
> Manu
>
> Péter Váry <peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com>于2025年5月20日 周二20:14写道:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>> Well done everyone who was working on this!
>>
>> Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. máj. 20.,
>> K, 8:49):
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Huge milestone, thanks for driving this, Ryan!
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Fokko
>>>
>>> Op di 20 mei 2025 om 08:45 schreef huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 11:17 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>>>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 8:14 AM Gidon Gershinsky <gg5...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>>>> Glad to see this big step forward.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers, Gidon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 9:00 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Excited to see Iceberg V3 coming together!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Ajantha
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:22 AM Christian Thiel <
>>>>>>> christian.t.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Prashant Singh <prashant010...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di. 20. Mai
>>>>>>>> 2025 um 07:34:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Prashant
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 10:19 PM Aihua Xu <aihu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding).  Great to see we are moving forward.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:06 PM Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:04 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yufei
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 8:59 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:37 PM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:35 AM Manish Malhotra <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manish.malhotra.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is Awesome! Thanks 🙏🏼
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:09 PM Szehon Ho <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> szehon.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, it's an exciting step for Iceberg!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Szehon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:03 PM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is exciting!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 3:27 PM Ryan Blue <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve gone through the changes in detail and I’m confident
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they are implementable and working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Reviewed and updated row lineage core
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    implementation, readers/writers, and updates to Spark 3.5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Validated the Variant encoding and shredding spec
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Built readers/writers for core object models for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    unknown, timestamp(9) types
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Implemented default values and updated read paths
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Reviewed table encryption PRs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 3:20 PM Ryan Blue <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With the follow-ups from the earlier discussion thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrapped up, I’d like to raise a vote to adopt the v3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spec changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/main/format/spec.md#version-3-extended-types-and-capabilities>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *What is included?*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Default values for columns and fields
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - New types: variant, geospatial, timestamp(9), and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Row lineage and change tracking using synthetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    row IDs and row-level last modified sequence number
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Improved position deletes using binary deletion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    vectors that are synchronously maintained
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Table encryption key tracking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Table metadata support for future multi-argument
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    transforms
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *What does adopting these changes mean?*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adopting the changes signals that we (the community)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intend to support the current set of changes and will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maintain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward-compatibility for v3 tables that implement the v3 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spec. After
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopting the changes, future breaking changes would go into 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> v4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As with v2 adoption
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ws2gg52d124p7bx9jgrn3kctrtfgtltp>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is needed to build support in downstream projects and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementations. Adoption doesn’t change the default table 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version, it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signals that there will be no further break changes in v3 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that we are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confident in supporting the v3 features.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huge thanks to everyone that has worked to get to this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point with the v3 changes!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Adopt the v3 changes to the table spec
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Wait to close v3 changes because . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to