Thanks everyone for the reviews and votes. This vote passes with the following tally:
+1: 7 (binding), 12 (non-binding) +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) I'll merge the PR and we can iterate on the implementation. -Dan On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 2:19 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) – left a minor comment. > > On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 7:16 PM Christian Thiel > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Eduard Tudenhöfner <[email protected]> schrieb am Do. 21. Mai > 2026 um 08:22: > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 1:57 AM Kurtis Wright <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 non-binding. Really exciting to see relative paths merged. > >>> > >>> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 1:40 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Great to see this moving ahead! > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 4:26 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hey everyone, > >>>>> > >>>>> I would like to start a vote to add relative paths to the v4 spec as > defined in PR #15630. > >>>>> > >>>>> This vote confirms the agreed-upon direction for relative paths in > v4. Changes can still happen until we finalize the v4 spec. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please review the PR and vote within the next 72 hours. > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 Add relative paths to the v4 spec > >>>>> [ ] +0 > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not add relative paths (please provide reasoning) > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Dan >
