+1 (non-binding) On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 11:45 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > Great to see this come together. Thanks for driving it forward! > > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:09 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 8:28 AM Russell Spitzer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 7:01 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non binding) >>>> >>>> Left a few minor comments that would be good to address. >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 6:57 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > +1 (non binding) >>>> > >>>> > ср, 20 мая 2026 г., 12:16 Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]>: >>>> >> >>>> >> +1 >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks Dan and Talat for working on this! >>>> >> >>>> >> Kind regards, >>>> >> Fokko >>>> >> >>>> >> On 2026/05/20 09:36:34 roryqi wrote: >>>> >> > +1 (non-binding) >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Gang Wu <[email protected]> 于2026年5月20日周三 16:58写道： >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > +1 (non-binding) >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 9:28 AM Alex Stephen via dev >>>> >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > +1 (non-binding) >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > Very excited for this! >>>> >> > > > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:39 PM Anurag Mantripragada < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> Thanks Dan and Talat. >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:21 PM Anoop Johnson < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > > >>> >>>> >> > > >>> +1. This proposal is incredibly useful for disaster recovery >>>> use cases with Iceberg. Thank you for driving this! >>>> >> > > >>> >>>> >> > > >>> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 4:50 PM Amogh Jahagirdar < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > > >>>> >>>> >> > > >>>> +1 Thanks Dan and Talat! >>>> >> > > >>>> >>>> >> > > >>>> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:23 PM Daniel Weeks < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > > >>>>> >>>> >> > > >>>>> Hey everyone, >>>> >> > > >>>>> >>>> >> > > >>>>> I would like to start a vote to add relative paths to the >>>> v4 spec as defined in PR #15630. >>>> >> > > >>>>> >>>> >> > > >>>>> This vote confirms the agreed-upon direction for relative >>>> paths in v4. Changes can still happen until we finalize the v4 spec. >>>> >> > > >>>>> >>>> >> > > >>>>> Please review the PR and vote within the next 72 hours. >>>> >> > > >>>>> >>>> >> > > >>>>> [ ] +1 Add relative paths to the v4 spec >>>> >> > > >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>> >> > > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not add relative paths (please provide reasoning) >>>> >> > > >>>>> >>>> >> > > >>>>> Thanks, >>>> >> > > >>>>> Dan >>>> >> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards >>>> Junwang Zhao >>>> >>>
