+1 (binding)
Great to see this come together. Thanks for driving it forward!

On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:09 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 8:28 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 7:01 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>
>>> Left a few minor comments that would be good to address.
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 6:57 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1 (non binding)
>>> >
>>> > ср, 20 мая 2026 г., 12:16 Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]>:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks Dan and Talat for working on this!
>>> >>
>>> >> Kind regards,
>>> >> Fokko
>>> >>
>>> >> On 2026/05/20 09:36:34 roryqi wrote:
>>> >> > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Gang Wu <[email protected]> 于2026年5月20日周三 16:58写道:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 9:28 AM Alex Stephen via dev
>>> >> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > Very excited for this!
>>> >> > > > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:39 PM Anurag Mantripragada <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > > >>
>>> >> > > >> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> > > >>
>>> >> > > >> Thanks Dan and Talat.
>>> >> > > >>
>>> >> > > >> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:21 PM Anoop Johnson <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > > >>>
>>> >> > > >>> +1. This proposal is incredibly useful for disaster recovery
>>> use cases with Iceberg. Thank you for driving this!
>>> >> > > >>>
>>> >> > > >>> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 4:50 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > > >>>>
>>> >> > > >>>> +1 Thanks Dan and Talat!
>>> >> > > >>>>
>>> >> > > >>>> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:23 PM Daniel Weeks <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > >>>>> Hey everyone,
>>> >> > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > >>>>> I would like to start a vote to add relative paths to the
>>> v4 spec as defined in PR #15630.
>>> >> > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > >>>>> This vote confirms the agreed-upon direction for relative
>>> paths in v4. Changes can still happen until we finalize the v4 spec.
>>> >> > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > >>>>> Please review the PR and vote within the next 72 hours.
>>> >> > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > >>>>> [ ] +1 Add relative paths to the v4 spec
>>> >> > > >>>>> [ ] +0
>>> >> > > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not add relative paths (please provide reasoning)
>>> >> > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > >>>>> Thanks,
>>> >> > > >>>>> Dan
>>> >> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards
>>> Junwang Zhao
>>>
>>

Reply via email to