+1 (binding) Thanks Szehon On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 11:31 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 11:00 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 binding >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 9:47 AM Russell Spitzer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) - Also I don't think we really need a vote on this since >>> it should be what is already happening :) But no problem doing one. What we >>> really need is more committer approvals on the pr >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 9:32 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 5:22 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi all, >>>> > >>>> > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd like to call a vote on the >>>> > spec clarification in PR #16446 [2]. >>>> > >>>> > Summary of the change: >>>> > - The `day` partition transform's result type in the transform table >>>> is >>>> > changed from `int` to `date`, matching the long-standing default >>>> > behavior of Java, PyIceberg, Rust, and C++ (all of which write the >>>> > Avro `date` logical type in manifests). >>>> > - A note is added clarifying that readers must also accept plain `int` >>>> > values for the `day` transform, interpreting each as a date in days >>>> > since 1970-01-01. (Reader tolerance is also inherited from the Avro >>>> > spec, which requires readers to ignore unrecognized logical-type >>>> > annotations.) >>>> > >>>> > This is a clarification, not a behavioral change: the physical >>>> > representation (a 4-byte day count) is unchanged, and no existing >>>> > manifests are affected. It documents what implementations already do >>>> > and resolves an ambiguity that has been re-litigated several times >>>> > (issue #16414 [3], and most recently a real interop failure in >>>> > iceberg-go #1176 [4]). >>>> > >>>> > Per the contributor guide, changes under format/ require a vote even >>>> > for clarifications, hence this thread. >>>> > >>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> > >>>> > [ ] +1 Approve the spec clarification >>>> > [ ] +0 >>>> > [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide reasons) >>>> > >>>> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/wnhvdmwc3b1dxc2ogk7po682pky12cps >>>> > [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16446 >>>> > [3] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/16414 >>>> > [4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/pull/1176 >>>> > >>>> > Here's my +1 (non-binding). >>>> > >>>> > Best, >>>> > Andrei >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards >>>> Junwang Zhao >>>> >>>
