+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 5:38 AM Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 1:38 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 1:34 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Fokko > >> > >> On 2026/06/11 20:25:43 Szehon Ho wrote: > >> > +1 (binding) > >> > Thanks > >> > Szehon > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 11:31 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 (binding) > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 11:00 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> +1 binding > >> > >> > >> > >> Thank you! > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 9:47 AM Russell Spitzer < > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> +1 (binding) - Also I don't think we really need a vote on this > since > >> > >>> it should be what is already happening :) But no problem doing > one. What we > >> > >>> really need is more committer approvals on the pr > >> > >>> > >> > >>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 9:32 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 5:22 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev > >> > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > Hi all, > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd like to call a vote > on the > >> > >>>> > spec clarification in PR #16446 [2]. > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > Summary of the change: > >> > >>>> > - The `day` partition transform's result type in the transform > table > >> > >>>> is > >> > >>>> > changed from `int` to `date`, matching the long-standing > default > >> > >>>> > behavior of Java, PyIceberg, Rust, and C++ (all of which > write the > >> > >>>> > Avro `date` logical type in manifests). > >> > >>>> > - A note is added clarifying that readers must also accept > plain `int` > >> > >>>> > values for the `day` transform, interpreting each as a date > in days > >> > >>>> > since 1970-01-01. (Reader tolerance is also inherited from > the Avro > >> > >>>> > spec, which requires readers to ignore unrecognized > logical-type > >> > >>>> > annotations.) > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > This is a clarification, not a behavioral change: the physical > >> > >>>> > representation (a 4-byte day count) is unchanged, and no > existing > >> > >>>> > manifests are affected. It documents what implementations > already do > >> > >>>> > and resolves an ambiguity that has been re-litigated several > times > >> > >>>> > (issue #16414 [3], and most recently a real interop failure in > >> > >>>> > iceberg-go #1176 [4]). > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > Per the contributor guide, changes under format/ require a > vote even > >> > >>>> > for clarifications, hence this thread. > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > [ ] +1 Approve the spec clarification > >> > >>>> > [ ] +0 > >> > >>>> > [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide reasons) > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/wnhvdmwc3b1dxc2ogk7po682pky12cps > >> > >>>> > [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16446 > >> > >>>> > [3] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/16414 > >> > >>>> > [4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/pull/1176 > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > Here's my +1 (non-binding). > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > Best, > >> > >>>> > Andrei > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> -- > >> > >>>> Regards > >> > >>>> Junwang Zhao > >> > >>>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
