Thanks Kevin and everyone involved! сб, 13 июн. 2026 г., 02:18 Kevin Liu <[email protected]>:
> Thanks everyone for voting. With 6 binding and 7 non-binding +1 votes, > this has passed. I'll go ahead and merge the PR > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 3:59 AM Tanmay Rauth <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 7:39 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 5:38 AM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 1:38 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > +1 (non-binding) >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 1:34 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> +1 (binding) >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks! >>>> >> >>>> >> Kind regards, >>>> >> Fokko >>>> >> >>>> >> On 2026/06/11 20:25:43 Szehon Ho wrote: >>>> >> > +1 (binding) >>>> >> > Thanks >>>> >> > Szehon >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 11:31 AM Amogh Jahagirdar < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > > +1 (binding) >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 11:00 AM Kevin Liu < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > >> +1 binding >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> Thank you! >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 9:47 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>> >> > >> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >>> +1 (binding) - Also I don't think we really need a vote on >>>> this since >>>> >> > >>> it should be what is already happening :) But no problem doing >>>> one. What we >>>> >> > >>> really need is more committer approvals on the pr >>>> >> > >>> >>>> >> > >>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 9:32 AM Junwang Zhao < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > >>> >>>> >> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >> > >>>> >>>> >> > >>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 5:22 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev >>>> >> > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> >> > >>>> > Hi all, >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> >> > >>>> > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd like to call a >>>> vote on the >>>> >> > >>>> > spec clarification in PR #16446 [2]. >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> >> > >>>> > Summary of the change: >>>> >> > >>>> > - The `day` partition transform's result type in the >>>> transform table >>>> >> > >>>> is >>>> >> > >>>> > changed from `int` to `date`, matching the long-standing >>>> default >>>> >> > >>>> > behavior of Java, PyIceberg, Rust, and C++ (all of which >>>> write the >>>> >> > >>>> > Avro `date` logical type in manifests). >>>> >> > >>>> > - A note is added clarifying that readers must also accept >>>> plain `int` >>>> >> > >>>> > values for the `day` transform, interpreting each as a >>>> date in days >>>> >> > >>>> > since 1970-01-01. (Reader tolerance is also inherited >>>> from the Avro >>>> >> > >>>> > spec, which requires readers to ignore unrecognized >>>> logical-type >>>> >> > >>>> > annotations.) >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> >> > >>>> > This is a clarification, not a behavioral change: the >>>> physical >>>> >> > >>>> > representation (a 4-byte day count) is unchanged, and no >>>> existing >>>> >> > >>>> > manifests are affected. It documents what implementations >>>> already do >>>> >> > >>>> > and resolves an ambiguity that has been re-litigated >>>> several times >>>> >> > >>>> > (issue #16414 [3], and most recently a real interop failure >>>> in >>>> >> > >>>> > iceberg-go #1176 [4]). >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> >> > >>>> > Per the contributor guide, changes under format/ require a >>>> vote even >>>> >> > >>>> > for clarifications, hence this thread. >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> >> > >>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> >> > >>>> > [ ] +1 Approve the spec clarification >>>> >> > >>>> > [ ] +0 >>>> >> > >>>> > [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide reasons) >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> >> > >>>> > [1] >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wnhvdmwc3b1dxc2ogk7po682pky12cps >>>> >> > >>>> > [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16446 >>>> >> > >>>> > [3] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/16414 >>>> >> > >>>> > [4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/pull/1176 >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> >> > >>>> > Here's my +1 (non-binding). >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> >> > >>>> > Best, >>>> >> > >>>> > Andrei >>>> >> > >>>> >>>> >> > >>>> >>>> >> > >>>> >>>> >> > >>>> -- >>>> >> > >>>> Regards >>>> >> > >>>> Junwang Zhao >>>> >> > >>>> >>>> >> > >>> >>>> >> > >>>> >>>
