Keep support for Spark last LTS + 2 latest minors sounds reasonable, if Iceberg 
could have a roughly 3 months release periods, which is similar to Spark and 
Flink, otherwise, it requires a wider version range to avoid version jumping 
when upgrading Iceberg.

And I think whether to dropping Spark 4.0 support does not block adding Spark 
4.2 support (with current RC state), I see at least two committer expressed the 
willingness on merging the spark 4.2 connector code as-is to unblock subsequent 
developing, and no objections, so, merge Spark 4.2 support first? And then 
start a vote thread for deleting Spark 4.0 support, if necessary?

Thanks,
Cheng Pan

Reply via email to