> > And I think whether to dropping Spark 4.0 support does not block adding > Spark 4.2 support (with current RC state)
+1, we can review and merge Spark 4.2 support first. I will start a vote to remove Spark 4.0 after the community sync tomorrow. Thanks, Anurag On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 1:08 AM Cheng Pan <[email protected]> wrote: > Keep support for Spark last LTS + 2 latest minors sounds reasonable, if > Iceberg could have a roughly 3 months release periods, which is similar to > Spark and Flink, otherwise, it requires a wider version range to avoid > version jumping when upgrading Iceberg. > > And I think whether to dropping Spark 4.0 support does not block adding > Spark 4.2 support (with current RC state), I see at least two committer > expressed the willingness on merging the spark 4.2 connector code as-is to > unblock subsequent developing, and no objections, so, merge Spark 4.2 > support first? And then start a vote thread for deleting Spark 4.0 support, > if necessary? > > Thanks, > Cheng Pan > >
