+1 (non-binding) This simplifies v4 design a lot. Let's merge it.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 3:51 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I think we will continue to iterate and make this more clear over time, > but the main purpose of this vote is to affirm our decision to no longer > allow equality deletes so let's merge it! > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 2:20 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Max >> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 10:47 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > The wording preserves reads of existing v2/v3 equality deletes after a >> metadata-only upgrade while prohibiting new equality deletes in v4. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Xuanwo >> >
