+1 (non-binding) Regards, Viquar Khan
On Mon, Sep 28, 2026, 5:56 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > This simplifies v4 design a lot. Let's merge it. > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 3:51 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> I think we will continue to iterate and make this more clear over time, >> but the main purpose of this vote is to affirm our decision to no longer >> allow equality deletes so let's merge it! >> >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 2:20 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Max >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 10:47 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 (non-binding) >>> > >>> > The wording preserves reads of existing v2/v3 equality deletes after a >>> metadata-only upgrade while prohibiting new equality deletes in v4. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Xuanwo >>> >>
