I understand releasing late in the year can be difficult, but I feel like
it's a little early to be discounting a release by the end of the year.

Not every release needs to be large and there were a number of things that
didn't quite make the cutoff, so I'd like to keep the option open for
discussion.

-Dan

On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 10:36 AM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, Xin -
>
> > My strawman proposal is to support existing Iceberg functionality on
> Spark 4.2 and treat integration with new Spark features, such as the
> Transactional API, as best effort.
>
> That sounds good to me.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 10:10 AM Xin Huang via dev <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Anoop,
>>
>> Thanks for starting this discussion and for volunteering to manage the
>> 1.13 release.
>>
>> Alongside the V4 work, one open question is whether 1.13 should support
>> Spark 4.2 (as Anurag mentioned and actually this is also in my wish list
>> :-)). The PR to set up Spark 4.2 has been merged
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14984> (thanks, Manu!), but
>> publishing is currently skipped.
>>
>> If we do include Spark 4.2 support in 1.13, we should decide on the
>> scope. My strawman proposal is to support existing Iceberg functionality on
>> Spark 4.2 and treat integration with new Spark features, such as the
>> Transactional API, as best effort.
>>
>> Happy to hear what the community thinks and help here.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Xin
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 10:02 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Anoop,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your interest in being the release manager. I have already
>>> volunteered for the 1.13 release, but please feel free to take on the 1.14
>>> release.
>>>
>>> We should start planning the scope for 1.13. I was thinking of early
>>> next January as we are moving into the holiday season. My wish list for
>>> this release includes the V4 spec PR and some related early work and Spark
>>> 4.2 suppport.
>>>
>>> ~ Anurag
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 9:52 AM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> With the closure of 1.12 (thanks Neelesh!),  I'd like to open a
>>>> discussion on 1.13.  I think we'd like to get another release out before
>>>> the end of the year and include some of the early work on V4 as we're
>>>> making good progress.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for 1.13 and keep this
>>>> discussion going.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Anoop
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to