+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 3:41 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 3:34 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> this vote was originally in spam for me :( >> >> пт, 9 окт. 2026 г., 23:13 Neelesh Salian <[email protected]>: >> >>> +1 (non-binding). Thanks everyone for all the work to get us here. >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 05:14 Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey folks, >>>> >>>> As discussed across various syncs, we're aiming to get the baseline V4 >>>> AMT spec PR <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16025> into the >>>> repo. >>>> >>>> To be clear, this is like many of the other spec votes we've done so >>>> far where the vote is specifically for merging the changes into the main >>>> repo and this is *not* a vote for adoption. >>>> >>>> Aspects like encryption, specific requirements for column file updates, >>>> dropping the partition tuple, and other areas can be iterated on later; >>>> this vote is largely just to get a set of baseline changes in that won't >>>> require extensive rebasing given all the other v4 changes that are ongoing. >>>> >>>> Lastly, I want to thank everyone involved. Even though this is a >>>> baseline PR, it represents many months of effort and thoughtful discussion >>>> and reasoning from many people. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>> >>>
