+1 (non-binding)

On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 10:51 PM Gábor Kaszab <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (nb)
>
> Excited to see this taking shape.
> Let me cover the encryption part of this with an immediate follow-up
> change.
>
> Gabor
>
> Scott Haines <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. okt.
> 10., Szo, 1:53):
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>> *Scott Haines*
>> OSS Engineer
>> E: 408.768.3799 <(408)%20768-3799>
>> LI: https://www.linkedin.com/in/scotthaines/
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.linkedin.com/in/scotthaines/__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!rEUazh0Usy9abxUCRuiugD9pcHWrQJD8K1rxXepxcSj15W7E6-lhxBW0R7RKlqT79lM9n8PrqrO4QmOHoECDsQlzRo3g$>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 5:54 PM Hongyue Zhang <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 3:41 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 3:34 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>>
>>>>>  this vote was originally in spam for me :(
>>>>>
>>>>> пт, 9 окт. 2026 г., 23:13 Neelesh Salian <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding). Thanks everyone for all the work to get us here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 05:14 Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey folks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As discussed across various syncs, we're aiming to get the baseline
>>>>>>> V4 AMT spec PR
>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16025__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!rEUazh0Usy9abxUCRuiugD9pcHWrQJD8K1rxXepxcSj15W7E6-lhxBW0R7RKlqT79lM9n8PrqrO4QmOHoECDsUIFAGj1$>
>>>>>>>  into
>>>>>>> the repo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To be clear, this is like many of the other spec votes we've done so
>>>>>>> far where the vote is specifically for merging the changes into the main
>>>>>>> repo and this is *not* a vote for adoption.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aspects like encryption, specific requirements for column file
>>>>>>> updates, dropping the partition tuple, and other areas can be iterated 
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> later; this vote is largely just to get a set of baseline changes in 
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> won't require extensive rebasing given all the other v4 changes that are
>>>>>>> ongoing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lastly, I want to thank everyone involved. Even though this is a
>>>>>>> baseline PR, it represents many months of effort and thoughtful 
>>>>>>> discussion
>>>>>>> and reasoning from many people.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to